Indigenous Biodiversity Conservation Practices in the Philippines

Indigenous communities in the Philippines play a vital role in safeguarding biodiversity through traditional knowledge, sustainable practices, and community-led stewardship. The following locally grounded interventions reflect both time-honored customs and contemporary strategies aligned with national and global conservation goals.

The following are the recommended local-level interventions:

1. Promoting Sustainable Use of Biodiversity Resources

• Encourage traditional ecological practices, such as rotational farming, seed saving, and the cultivation of herbal medicine.
• Example: Dumagat communities in Rizal practice Natural Agriculture using heirloom seeds and zero agrochemicals to protect forest ecosystems.

2. Empowering Local Residents to Protect Forests

• Train indigenous youth and elders in forest monitoring, wildlife protection, and community patrols.
• Example: The Philippine ICCA Project supports indigenous-led conservation in ancestral domains, covering over 150,000 hectares.

3. Demarcating Agricultural and Forest Zones

• Launch community mapping initiatives to define boundaries and prevent encroachment.
• Example: UNDP and NCIP have helped 17 IP communities delineate forest zones and document traditional land use systems.

4. Supporting Individual/Family Forest Stewardship

• Recognize and formalize family-managed forest plots within ancestral domains.
• Example: The Ayta of Maporac in Zambales manage sacred forest areas through customary laws and rituals.

5. Restoring Degraded Areas Through Community Action

• Mobilize local groups for reforestation, agroforestry, and watershed rehabilitation.
• Example: In Nueva Vizcaya, the Ikalahan/Kalanguya IPs restored degraded lands using native species and cultural planting practices.

6. Instilling the Value of Sustainability

• Integrate biodiversity ethics into local education, rituals, and storytelling.
• Example: The IPBSAP (Indigenous Peoples Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan) promotes intergenerational transmission of conservation values.

7. Conducting Biodiversity Awareness Campaigns

• Utilize local languages and media to underscore the global importance of biodiversity.
• Example: The “Be Part of the Plan” campaign by UNDP emphasizes IP inclusion in achieving the 30x30 global biodiversity targets.

8. Educating on Controlled Burning Practices

• Share indigenous fire management techniques that prevent wildfires and support ecological balance.
• Example: Some IP communities use seasonal, low-intensity burns to regenerate grasslands and prevent invasive species.

Issues and Challenges in Biodiversity Conservation in Indigenous Lands

1. Overexploitation of Natural Resources

Continuous harvesting of preferred tree species, such as narra, molave, and dipterocarps, for construction, furniture, and handicrafts has led to population decline and habitat loss. This is amplified by population growth and market demand.

    Example: The harvesting of narra trees in the ancestral lands of the Tagbanua in Palawan has impacted both biodiversity and cultural traditions.

2. Land Use Alteration for Agriculture

Forests are often cleared for upland farming, including slash-and-burn methods. While traditional practices allowed natural regeneration, increased clearing without rest periods disrupts ecological succession.

    Example: In parts of the Cordillera, expanding agricultural plots have fragmented mossy forest habitats vital for endemic bird species.

3. Forest Fires from Agricultural Clearing

Fires may unintentionally spread during land clearing, especially during dry months. These fires harm species in grasslands and young forest stands undergoing recovery.

    Example: Forest fire outbreaks in Bukidnon have affected ancestral land areas of the Talaandig and damaged key seedling zones.

4. Limited Knowledge of Biodiversity’s Global Role

Some community members are more aware of biodiversity’s local uses than its broader ecological functions (e.g., carbon sequestration, climate regulation). Information campaigns exist but often lack reach and depth.

    Example: A study in Bicol revealed that fewer than half of surveyed upland farmers could identify biodiversity's role in flood and climate resilience.

5. Weak Capacity of Barangay Governance

Local officials often lack the budget, training, and manpower to enforce biodiversity laws, even when policies are in place at national or regional levels.

    Example: In Mindoro, environmental ordinances protecting tamaraw habitats remain unimplemented due to staffing and logistical constraints.

 6. Absence of Sustainable Livelihoods

Without reliable income sources, many residents rely on forest resources for food, fuel, and cash crops, leading to pressure on flora and fauna.

    Example: Communities near Mt. Hamiguitan have begun ecotourism and agroforestry programs to reduce dependency on extraction.

Causes of Biodiversity Loss in Indigenous Lands in the Philippines

 1. Logging and Forest Exploitation

Decades of commercial and illegal logging have stripped indigenous forests of old-growth trees, reducing species richness and destabilizing local ecosystems. Logging alters hydrological cycles and nutrient distribution, triggering long-term degradation.

Example: The Sierra Madre mountain range has suffered deforestation from both legal concessions and illegal logging operations, affecting endemic species like the Philippine eagle.

2. Unsustainable Upland Farming

Traditional slash-and-burn (kaingin) agriculture allowed recovery through rotation and rest. However, increased migration into upland areas led to overuse, reduced fallow periods, and soil exhaustion.

Example: The Cordillera region faces challenges from intensified kaingin due to population pressure, threatening native pine forests and soil biodiversity.

3. Unregulated Hunting

Hunting for subsistence, sport, or training, when unmonitored, depletes animal populations and disrupts ecological balance. Key species lose their roles in seed dispersal, pollination, and predator-prey relationships.

Example: In Palawan, hunting has impacted the population of the Palawan bearded pig and pangolin, both vital to forest regeneration.

4. Destructive Fishing Practices

Aquatic ecosystems suffer from overfishing and harmful techniques such as blast fishing and cyanide use. These destroy coral reefs, breeding grounds, and juvenile populations.

Example: In coastal Mindanao, coral damage from illegal fishing has led to reduced fish catch and loss of marine biodiversity.

5. Forest Fires

High temperatures and human negligence can spark fires, consuming vast areas of forest and harming flora, fauna, and traditional lands.

Example: Fires in Mt. Kalatungan, Bukidnon have affected ancestral territories and forest-dependent wildlife like the Philippine warty pig.

6. Improper Grazing

Free-range livestock grazing in forest edges or community grasslands can trample vegetation, cause erosion, and introduce invasive plant species.

Example: Grazing near Mt. Apo has led to the degradation of critical habitats used by indigenous groups for medicinal and cultural plants.

7. Land Conversion and Urban Expansion

Expanding residential zones into forested regions fragments habitats and displaces indigenous species. This also disconnects indigenous communities from their ecological and cultural landscapes.

Example: Encroachment into ancestral domains in Northern Mindanao has limited access to traditional lands and endangered species such as the flying lemur (kagwang).

What role do indigenous people play in developing, managing, and protecting natural spaces and ecosystems?

Indigenous Peoples play a crucial and multifaceted role in shaping, sustaining, and safeguarding natural ecosystems. Their contributions go far beyond passive guardianship, they are active architects of biodiversity and ecological resilience.

Development of Natural Spaces

•  Place-based innovation. Indigenous communities design agricultural systems like terraced farming (e.g., Ifugao rice terraces) and agroforestry that harmonize with local ecosystems.
• Cultural mapping. They identify sacred sites, medicinal plant zones, and wildlife corridors, guiding land-use planning with ecological and spiritual insight.
•  Sustainable infrastructure. Traditional housing and irrigation systems often use renewable materials and mimic natural processes.

Management of Ecosystems

• Customary governance. Indigenous laws and rituals regulate hunting, harvesting, and land access, ensuring long-term sustainability.
•  Seasonal calendars. Ecological knowledge passed down through generations helps communities align activities with natural cycles.
• Fire and water stewardship. Aboriginal Australians use controlled burns to prevent wildfires, while mountain tribes in Asia manage watershed forests to protect downstream communities.

Protection and Conservation

• Biodiversity guardianship.  Indigenous territories cover 22–25% of the world’s land and shelter 80% of the remaining biodiversity.
• Climate resilience. Their adaptive strategies, ike crop diversification and forest preservation, help buffer against climate shocks.
•  Environmental defense. Indigenous leaders often risk their lives to resist deforestation, mining, and land grabs, making them frontline defenders of the planet.

Collaborative Impact

• Co-management models. Governments and NGOs increasingly partner with Indigenous communities to manage parks, marine reserves, and biosphere zones.
• Knowledge integration. Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) complements scientific data, offering insights into species behavior, soil health, and climate patterns.
• Policy influence. Indigenous voices are shaping global conservation agendas, from COP summits to UN biodiversity frameworks.

What Does “Traditionally Owned, Managed, or Occupied” Mean?

This phrase refers to land relationships based on ancestral use, cultural practices, and spiritual ties, rather than formal legal titles. Here's how each term breaks down:

How is land defined as traditionally owned

The phrase “traditionally owned” refers to land or territory that has been occupied, used, and cared for by Indigenous communities over generations, based on their customs, spiritual beliefs, and ancestral ties. This form of ownership is rooted in cultural identity and collective stewardship, rather than formal legal titles. It reflects a deep connection to the land, where rights and responsibilities are passed down through oral traditions, rituals, and community governance. In many cases, such ownership is recognized through customary law and affirmed in legal frameworks like the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA) in the Philippines.

In what way is land considered to be under traditional managed?

The term traditionally managed refers to land or territory that has been governed and cared for by Indigenous communities using customary laws, practices, and ecological knowledge passed down through generations. This management style is rooted in spiritual beliefs, cultural rituals, and collective responsibility, rather than formal state-imposed systems or modern bureaucratic frameworks.

In this context, land is not just a resource, it’s a living entity that is actively protected, cultivated, and respected through Indigenous governance structures. These include seasonal harvesting, sacred site preservation, rotational farming, and community-led decision-making, all of which contribute to long-term sustainability and biodiversity conservation.

What is the meaning of traditionally occupied?

Traditionally occupied refers to land that has been inhabited, used, and cared for by Indigenous communities over generations, based on their customs, spiritual beliefs, and ancestral relationships. This occupation is not defined by formal legal ownership but by continuous presence and cultural connection, often passed down through oral histories, rituals, and communal practices.

In the Philippines, this concept is recognized under the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA), which affirms that Indigenous Peoples have rights to territories they have lived in and sustained “since time immemorial.” These lands include forests, watersheds, agricultural areas, and sacred sites that are essential to their identity, survival, and ecological stewardship.

Foundations of Sustainability

Interconnectedness of life. Many Indigenous cultures view humans, animals, plants, and landscapes as part of a unified whole. This belief fosters a deep sense of responsibility toward nature.

Spiritual ecology. Natural elements like rivers, mountains, and forests are often considered sacred. Rituals and taboos help regulate resource use and prevent exploitation.

Custodianship over ownership. Land is not owned but cared for. Stewardship is passed down through generations, guided by oral traditions and ancestral knowledge.

The following are traditional practices that sustain ecosystems:

1.     Rotational farming and shifting cultivation. These methods allow soil to recover, reduce erosion, and maintain biodiversity.

2.     Agroforestry systems. Indigenous communities often grow crops alongside native trees, enhancing soil fertility and creating habitats for wildlife.

3.     Seasonal harvesting. Timing harvests with natural cycles ensures that plants and animals can regenerate.

4.     Sacred conservation zones. Certain areas are protected due to spiritual significance, functioning as informal wildlife sanctuaries.

Global Contributions and Local Examples

Indigenous communities across the globe actively protect ecosystems through culturally rooted and ecologically sound practices. In the Philippines, groups such as the Ifugao and Mangyan manage ancestral forests by applying customary laws, spiritual traditions, and localized ecological knowledge. These efforts have been strengthened by the ICCA (Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities Conserved Areas) initiative, which recognizes Indigenous stewardship within formal conservation frameworks. In the Amazon Basin, Indigenous patrols have successfully confronted illegal logging and established conservation corridors that safeguard millions of hectares of rainforest. Meanwhile, in Australia, Aboriginal fire management, through strategic controlled burning, has become a powerful tool in reducing wildfire risks and restoring ecological balance. These examples reflect the vital role Indigenous Peoples play in sustaining biodiversity and shaping inclusive environmental policy.

Challenges and Resilience

1.     Land rights and recognition: Many Indigenous territories lack formal protection, making them vulnerable to exploitation.

2.     Climate change: Shifting weather patterns threaten traditional farming and water sources, yet Indigenous adaptive strategies offer valuable lessons.

3.     Cultural erosion: Loss of language and traditional governance weakens ecological knowledge transmission.

Integrating Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge

Indigenous contributions to environmental sustainability are increasingly being recognized through collaborative and inclusive frameworks. Their ecological wisdom, rooted in centuries of lived experience, often complements scientific data—especially in remote and biodiverse regions where conventional research may be limited. Co-management models that bring together Indigenous communities and state agencies foster more equitable governance, resulting in conservation efforts that are both culturally sensitive and ecologically sound. Meanwhile, Indigenous youth and leaders are stepping onto global platforms with growing confidence, advocating for sustainability and climate justice while sharing perspectives grounded in ancestral knowledge and lived realities. These integrated efforts reflect the power of respectful partnership in shaping resilient and inclusive environmental policies.

The Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act of 1997 (RA 8371)

What Is RA 8371?

RA 8371 is a landmark Philippine law that recognizes and protects the rights of Indigenous Peoples (IPs) and Indigenous Cultural Communities (ICCs). It was passed in 1997 to correct centuries of marginalization and ensure that IPs can live with dignity, autonomy, and cultural integrity.

RA 8371 is more than just a legal document, it’s a tool for empowerment and justice. It affirms that Indigenous Peoples are not just beneficiaries of aid but active stewards of their land, culture, and future.

Who Implements It?

The National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) is the government agency tasked with enforcing the law. It helps issue land titles, resolve disputes, and ensure that development projects respect Indigenous rights.

Ancestral Domain Recognition

• The Subanen of Zamboanga Peninsula received a Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) covering over 500,000 hectares. This gave them legal control over their forests, rivers, and sacred sites.
• The Tagbanua of Coron, Palawan were granted rights to their ancestral waters, allowing them to manage fishing grounds and protect marine biodiversity.

Customary Law in Action

• In Kalinga, the Bodong (peace pact system) is used to resolve disputes between tribes. RA 8371 recognizes this as a valid form of justice.
• Manobo elders in Mindanao continue to use oral traditions and community consensus to settle land conflicts, with support from the NCIP.

Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC)

• The Ifugao community halted a hydroelectric project that threatened their rice terraces by refusing FPIC, citing cultural and environmental concerns.
• In Bukidnon, the Talaandig tribe negotiated terms with a plantation company, ensuring employment and environmental safeguards before allowing operations.

Cultural Education and Preservation

• Indigenous schools in Mindoro teach in the Mangyan language and include traditional knowledge in the curriculum.
• The Teduray and Lambangian peoples in ARMM developed community-based education programs that blend formal schooling with cultural practices.

Challenges and Advocacy

• Despite legal protections, some communities like the Lumad in Mindanao face displacement due to militarization and mining interests. Activists use RA 8371 to demand accountability and protection.
• The Chico River Dam resistance in the Cordillera, led by Macli-ing Dulag, became a symbol of Indigenous empowerment and helped inspire the creation of IPRA.

Summary of the key provisions:

Rights to Ancestral Domains and Lands

• IPs have ownership and control over ancestral domains and lands, including forests, rivers, and sacred sites.
• They can develop, manage, and conserve resources within their territories.
• Protection from displacement without Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC).
• Right to regulate entry of outsiders and organizations into their domains.

Self-Governance and Empowerment

• Recognition of customary laws, leadership structures, and justice systems.
• IPs can maintain their own political institutions, such as councils of elders.
• Right to participate in decision-making on policies and projects affecting them.

Cultural Integrity

• Protection of languages, traditions, rituals, and knowledge systems.
• Support for community-controlled education and cultural institutions.
• Right to preserve and develop their cultural heritage.

Social Justice and Human Rights

• Equal access to basic services like education, health, water, and infrastructure.
• Prohibition of discrimination based on ethnicity, gender, or cultural identity.
• Right to redress and compensation for violations of their rights.

National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP)

• Created as the lead agency to implement RA 8371.
• Issues Certificates of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) and resolves disputes.
• Coordinates development programs and ensures FPIC is respected.

Legal and Administrative Provisions

• Customary laws are prioritized in resolving land and cultural disputes.
• Establishes procedures for delineating ancestral domains and issuing titles.
• Provides penalties for violations, including fines and imprisonment.

In what ways does the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act of 1997 safeguard cultural identity, and how can these provisions be strengthened in modern Philippine society?

Post your response in the comment section, then choose another response to reply with your opinion

Download this Activity

UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)

What is UNDRIP?

UNDRIP is a global affirmation that Indigenous peoples have the right to live with dignity, preserve their cultures, govern themselves, and protect their ancestral lands. It’s not just a document, it’s a moral compass that guides how governments, institutions, and societies should treat Indigenous communities.

Examples of UNDRIP Principles:

Self-Determination

Indigenous peoples have the right to decide how they live, govern, and develop.

Example: In New Zealand, Māori tribes have their own tribal councils and negotiate directly with the government on issues like education and land use. Their autonomy is respected in many areas, including language revitalization and cultural preservation.

Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC)

Governments must consult Indigenous communities before launching projects that affect them.

Example: In the Philippines, mining companies must obtain consent from Indigenous groups before operating on ancestral lands. The Subanon people in Zamboanga Peninsula successfully halted a mining project that threatened their sacred sites by invoking their right to FPIC under the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA).

Protection of Culture and Identity

Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and celebrate their languages, traditions, and spiritual practices.

Example: In Canada, the Cree Nation has developed language immersion schools to preserve Cree language and culture. These schools are run by the community and reflect Indigenous values and teaching methods.

Land and Resource Rights

Indigenous peoples have the right to own and manage their ancestral territories.

Example: The Igorot people in the Cordillera region of the Philippines have long defended their mountains from logging and dam projects. Through IPRA and community organizing, they’ve secured legal recognition of their ancestral domain.

Equality and Non-Discrimination

Indigenous individuals must be treated equally and protected from discrimination.

Example: In Bolivia, Indigenous leaders hold high-ranking government positions, and the constitution recognizes Indigenous justice systems alongside national law.

Why It Matters

UNDRIP doesn’t create new rights, it affirms existing ones and insists they apply to Indigenous peoples. It’s a tool for justice, healing, and empowerment. Countries that embrace it are taking steps toward reconciliation and respect.

Here's a concise summary of all the provisions:

Articles 1–5: Foundational Rights

• Article 1: Indigenous peoples have the right to enjoy all human rights and freedoms.
• Article 2: Right to be free from discrimination based on Indigenous identity.
• Article 3: Right to self-determination.
• Article 4: Right to autonomy in internal affairs.
• Article 5: Right to maintain distinct institutions and participate in the broader society.

Articles 6–10: Protection and Security

• Article 6: Right to a nationality.
• Article 7: Right to life, liberty, and security.
• Article 8: Protection from forced assimilation and cultural destruction.
• Article 9: Right to belong to Indigenous communities.
• Article 10: Protection from forced relocation without free, prior, and informed consent.

Articles 11–13: Cultural Rights

• Article 11: Right to practice and revitalize cultural traditions.
• Article 12: Right to spiritual practices and access to sacred sites.
• Article 13: Right to preserve and transmit languages and histories.

Articles 14–17: Education, Media, and Labor

• Article 14: Right to culturally appropriate education.
• Article 15: Right to dignity in public education and information.
• Article 16: Right to establish Indigenous media.
• Article 17: Protection from exploitation in labor and employment.

Articles 18–24: Participation and Well-being

• Article 18: Right to participate in decision-making.
• Article 19: Right to free, prior, and informed consent.
• Article 20: Right to maintain political, economic, and social institutions.
• Article 21: Right to improvement of economic and social conditions.
• Article 22: Protection of Indigenous elders, women, youth, and persons with disabilities.
• Article 23: Right to determine development priorities.
• Article 24: Right to traditional medicines and health practices.

Articles 25–30: Land, Resources, and Environment

• Article 25: Right to maintain spiritual relationship with lands.
• Article 26: Right to own and control traditional lands and territories.
• Article 27: Right to fair procedures for land claims.
• Article 28: Right to redress for lands taken without consent.
• Article 29: Right to environmental protection of territories.
• Article 30: Protection from military activity on Indigenous lands.

Articles 31–36: Knowledge, Identity, and Cooperation

• Article 31: Right to protect Indigenous cultural and intellectual property.
• Article 32: Right to determine development on lands and resources.
• Article 33: Right to determine identity and membership.
• Article 34: Right to maintain legal and customary institutions.
• Article 35: Right to determine responsibilities within communities.
• Article 36: Right to maintain cross-border relations with other Indigenous peoples.

Articles 37–40: Treaties and Justice

• Article 37: Right to recognition of treaties and agreements.
• Article 38: States must implement UNDRIP in consultation with Indigenous peoples.
• Article 39: Right to access financial and technical assistance.
• Article 40: Right to fair and prompt resolution of disputes.

Articles 41–46: Implementation and Interpretation

• Article 41: UN bodies shall promote UNDRIP implementation.
• Article 42: States shall promote respect for UNDRIP.
• Article 43: Rights apply equally to Indigenous men and women.
• Article 44: All rights apply to individuals and collectives.
• Article 45: UNDRIP does not diminish existing rights.
• Article 46: UNDRIP must be interpreted in harmony with international law and human rights.

Discuss the importance of cultural preservation under UNDRIP. How does protecting language, tradition, and spiritual practices empower Indigenous peoples in modern society?

Post your response in the comment section, then choose another response to reply with your opinion

Download this Activity

Misrepresentation in Media and Literature

Indigenous Peoples have often been portrayed unfairly in books, films, and television. These portrayals can shape how others see them, and how they see themselves. Here are three common ways this misrepresentation happens:

1. Romanticization

This happens when Indigenous cultures are shown in overly idealized or unrealistic ways. For example, the “noble warrior” or “mystical native” are common characters in old Western movies. These images were often created by non-Indigenous writers, especially Europeans, who didn’t fully understand the cultures they were depicting. While these portrayals may seem positive, they flatten real people into stereotypes and ignore the diversity and complexity of Indigenous lives.

2. Historical Inaccuracies

The saying “history is written by the victors” applies here. Most stories about Indigenous Peoples in media have been told by non-Indigenous creators, often from a colonial perspective. This means important details about Indigenous cultures, beliefs, and struggles are left out or changed. As a result, audiences may grow up with a distorted view of history, missing the truth about colonization, resistance, and survival.

3. Simplistic Characterization

Indigenous characters are often shown as background figures or sidekicks. They rarely get to be the main character, and when they do appear, they’re usually silent, one-dimensional, or defined only by how they relate to non-Indigenous people. This lack of depth strips them of their humanity. Real people have strengths, flaws, dreams, and values, but these are often missing from how Indigenous characters are written.

Question:

How do romanticization, historical inaccuracies, and simplistic characterization in books, films, and television contribute to the misrepresentation of Indigenous Peoples? 

Post your response in the comment section, then choose another response to reply with your opinion

What Is Cultural Appropriation?

Cultural appropriation happens when people from a dominant group take or use elements of a minority culture like clothing, language, music, or traditions without understanding, respect, or permission. This can lead to stereotypes, disrespect, or even harm to the original culture.

1. Exchange

This is a fair and mutual sharing between two cultures that have equal power. Both sides benefit and agree to the exchange.

• Example: Two communities collaborate on a music project, blending their styles with mutual respect and credit.

2. Dominance

This happens when a powerful culture adopts parts of a weaker culture, especially one it has historically controlled or colonized.

• Example: A colonizing country adopts Indigenous clothing or rituals while continuing to suppress the people who created them.

3. Exploitation

This is when a dominant group takes cultural elements from a marginalized group without permission, payment, or acknowledgment.

• Example: A fashion brand profits from tribal designs without crediting or compensating the community it copied from.

4. Transculturation

This is a complex blending of cultures where elements are mixed so deeply that it’s hard to tell where they originally came from.

• Example: Modern street food that combines Asian, Latin, and Western flavors in ways that reflect many influences at once.

Cordillera IPs Defend the Bahag from Misuse

(Read the full story from: Philstar.com)

The bahag is a traditional loincloth worn by Indigenous men in the Cordillera region. It’s not just clothing, it holds deep cultural meaning, symbolizing identity, heritage, and respect for tradition.

In 2022, controversy erupted when contestants in an international male pageant wore the bahag during a swimsuit competition. Many Cordillera Indigenous Peoples (IPs) and cultural advocates felt that the way it was worn, tucked and styled like modern swimwear, was disrespectful and stripped of its cultural context. Some online posts even sexualized the attire, which added to the offense.

The National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) in the Cordillera responded by reminding the public that traditional garments like the bahag should be treated with dignity. They emphasized that only the community has the right to decide how their cultural symbols are used or adapted. The NCIP also supported possible actions by the community to protect their heritage from misuse.

This incident sparked broader conversations about cultural appropriation, especially when Indigenous symbols are used for entertainment or profit without proper understanding or consent.

Download this Activity

Key challenges Indigenous Peoples in the Philippines

Upland Displacement and Land Classification

As lowland areas were taken over for development and resource extraction, many Indigenous communities moved into the highlands. However, under Philippine law, land with a slope over 18 degrees is classified as “public forest land,” meaning it cannot be owned or sold. This land falls under the control of the Forest Management Bureau (FMB) of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). Even though millions of people, including Indigenous groups, live in these areas, they are still often labeled as “informal settlers”, which undermines their ancestral claims.

Government Programs and Shifting Approaches

In the 1970s, the government began to recognize that punishing Indigenous communities wasn’t working. Instead, it launched programs like the Integrated Social Forestry Program (ISFP) to:

• Let Indigenous people stay on their land
• Encourage sustainable farming and conservation
• Promote cooperation instead of conflict

This marked a shift toward supportive engagement rather than forced removal.

Conflict Zones and Militarization

Many Indigenous communities live in areas affected by armed conflict, especially in Mindanao. They’ve been caught in the crossfire between: State forces and Rebel groups like the New People’s Army (NPA) and the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF)

These conflicts have led to displacement, violence, and fear, making it even harder for Indigenous Peoples to protect their land and way of life.

Legal Protections vs. Reality

The Philippines has progressive laws like the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA), which recognizes ancestral domains. However, these laws are not always enforced

• Indigenous rights are often ignored in favor of business or military interests
• Real progress has come mostly from grassroots organizing, not from top-down reforms

Despite legal recognition and some government programs, Indigenous Peoples in the Philippines still face major challenges:

• Their lands are often classified in ways that deny them ownership
• They are vulnerable to displacement, conflict, and environmental destruction
• True progress has come from their own efforts, not just from government action

Questions:

1. In the absence of strong legal enforcement, how have Indigenous communities used grassroots advocacy to reclaim space and assert their rights? Evaluate the strengths and limitations of bottom-up resistance in the face of institutional neglect.
2. How have armed conflicts in Mindanao exacerbated the displacement and disenfranchisement of Indigenous Peoples? Discuss the human rights impact of militarization on community organizing, education, and land defense.

Post your response in the comment section, then choose another response to reply with your opinion

Real-World Examples

Here are some of the most pressing issues, along with real-world examples:

1. Land Disputes and Ancestral Domain Insecurity

Many IP communities struggle to secure legal recognition of their ancestral lands, despite the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA) of 1997.

Examples:

The Higaonon tribe in Northern Mindanao has faced displacement due to mining and palm oil agribusiness operations, despite their ancestral claims.

The Ayta Mag-indi community in Porac, Pampanga, continues to assert their land rights amid development pressures.

2. Resource Exploitation and Environmental Degradation

Large-scale mining, logging, and dam projects often encroach on indigenous territories without proper consultation or consent.

Example: In the Cordillera region, indigenous opposition to the Chico River Dam project in the 1970s became a landmark resistance movement. Similar struggles continue today against mining in the area.

3. Poverty and Marginalization

IPs are among the most impoverished groups in the country, with limited access to education, healthcare, and infrastructure.

Example: Many Lumad communities in Mindanao live in remote areas with little access to schools or clinics, making basic services a daily challenge.

4. Cultural Erosion and Misrepresentation

Modernization, migration, and media stereotypes contribute to the loss of indigenous languages, traditions, and identity.

Example: Indigenous practices are often misrepresented in textbooks and media, reinforcing harmful stereotypes rather than celebrating cultural diversity.

5. Political Exclusion and Human Rights Violations

IPs are frequently excluded from decision-making processes and are vulnerable to harassment, militarization, and even violence.

Example: Lumad schools have been red-tagged and shut down, with teachers and students accused of insurgency links, despite their focus on culturally relevant education.

Read the full story

References

1. Higaonon Tribe Land Disputes (Misamis Oriental, Mindanao)

Rappler. (2023). Misamis Oriental land rush threatens Higaonon ancestral domain. Read the article

Oxford Research Group. (2017). Weavers of Peace: The Higaonon Tribe in the Philippines. View source

2. Ayta Mag-indi Ancestral Domain Recognition (Porac, Pampanga)

Philippine News Agency. (2022). Pampanga IPs get 18.6K-hectare ancestral land after 13 years. View article

Porac LGU. (2022). Victory for Porac Indigenous Peoples!. Official statement

3. Chico River Dam Resistance (Cordillera Region)

Wikipedia. Chico River Dam Project. Background and history

Cambridge University Press. (2023). Peace pacts and contentious politics: The Chico River Dam struggle in the Philippines, 1974–82. Academic article

4. Lumad Communities and Access to Education and Healthcare (Mindanao)

Davao Today. (2019). Mindanao Lumad struggle for empowerment through education. Full report

CLANS. (2018). Center for Lumad Advocacy, Networking and Services. Program overview

5. Red-tagging and Human Rights Violations Against Lumad Schools

The Organization for World Peace. (2021). Fighting For An Education: Lumad Schools Under Attack. Read more

Rappler. (2021). Correcting the injustices against the Lumad schools. Opinion piece

 Question:

To what extent do state and corporate interests in natural resource development override indigenous rights to land and consultation? Analyze using historical and contemporary examples, such as the Chico River Dam project and mining in the Cordillera region.

Post your response in the comment section, then choose another response to reply with your opinion

Download this Activity